Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Longitudinal description and prediction of physical inactivity among patients with borderline personality disorder and personality-disordered comparison subjects

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation volume 11, Article number: 11 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The physical and psychological benefits of physical activity are well-known, and physical activity has been proven to be a helpful adjunct to psychotherapeutic treatment for many symptomatic disorders, including mood and anxiety disorders. The current study explores physical inactivity levels in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The first aim of this study is to describe the 12-year course of physical inactivity in patients with BPD. The second aim is to examine predictors of physical inactivity, including adversity experiences, comorbid symptomatic (formerly axis I) disorders, medical disorders, and demographic factors.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-five patients with BPD were interviewed seven times over 12-years of prospective follow-up as part of the McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD). Patients were categorized as ever-recovered (i.e., patient had experienced a symptomatic and psychosocial recovery from BPD) or never-recovered. At each follow-up, patients reported physical activity levels (minutes of exercise per week) via a semi-structured interview— the Medical History and Services Utilization Interview (MHSUI). Data was collected from June 1992 to December 2018.

Results

Never-recovered patients with BPD were significantly more inactive than their ever-recovered counterparts (p < 0.001). These rates of inactivity remained stable over time for both groups. Two significant multivariate predictors of inactivity were found: obesity (p = 0.003) and PTSD (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Non-recovered BPD patients are more likely to be inactive than patients who have recovered. Both clinical and medical factors appear to contribute to inactivity levels in patients with BPD.

Introduction

Physical inactivity is a common phenomenon among psychiatric disorders [1], and is particularly concerning due to its association with chronic diseases [2, 3], cardiovascular risk factors [4], and premature mortality [5,6,7]. Conversely, other studies have shown the positive effect physical activity has on overall wellbeing and psychological health [8,9,10,11,12].

The majority of reviews and studies exploring the relationship between physical activity and psychiatric disorders have focused on mood disorders [13,14,15,16,17], anxiety disorders [18,19,20,21,22], or both [23,24,25]. These studies have found that physical activity is associated with lower levels of psychiatric symptoms and/or higher levels of overall psychological wellbeing. Despite lack of consensus about optimal frequencies or intensities of physical activity, the basic conclusion is clear: not only does physical activity reduce symptoms of mood [8, 16] and anxiety disorders [19,20,21, 26], but physical activity also appears to protect against the emergence of such symptoms [21]. Relatedly, several studies have found that physical activity is a helpful adjunct in the treatment of these disorders [8, 19, 26, 27].

Research has also explored the relationship between physical activity and three other major symptomatic disorder (formerly axis I) categories: substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and eating disorders. Five systematic reviews have assessed the impact of physical activity on substance use, with four reviews finding that physical activity was related to a reduction of substance use behaviors [28,29,30,31], in addition to comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms [29, 30]. Interestingly, one study found that though physical activity was a protective factor against drug use in an adolescent population, physical activity actually increased the risk of alcohol use [28]. The final review did not find evidence for a positive effect of physical activity on alcohol usage, but did find relative support for physical activity on global substance use [31]. Similar results have been found for physical activity and PTSD, with metanalyses showing that increasing physical activity is an effective way to decrease PTSD symptoms [32,33,34] and can be a helpful adjunct in therapeutic treatment of PTSD [35].

Understandably, physical activity and eating disorders is likely the most complex relationship, given that compensatory and/or compulsive exercise is a symptom of many eating disorders [36]. However, of the available literature exploring physical activity and eating disorders, research has indeed suggested that, similar to the other symptomatic disorders reviewed, physical activity can help reduce symptoms [37,38,39,40].

With physical activity research primarily focusing on major symptomatic disorder categories (mostly concentrated in mood and anxiety disorders), considerably less attention has been paid to physical inactivity levels in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Our group published two papers with the first preliminary findings on this relationship, with results showing that non-remitted [41] and non-recovered [42] patients with BPD reported more maladaptive health-related lifestyle choices as compared to their other personality-disordered counterparts, including lack of regular exercise. More recently, St-Amour et al. [43] have explored the potential impact of physical exercise on negative affect in BPD, but found no significant decrease in the level of negative affect in these patients after acute exercise.

The current study aims to explore physical inactivity levels in a large and well-defined sample of patients with BPD over 12 years of prospective follow-up. The descriptive aim of this study is to describe the prevalence rates of physical inactivity in two sub-groups of BPD (ever versus never-recovered) across over a decade of follow-up. The predictive aim of this study is to explore a range of meaningful health-related and clinical predictors of physical inactivity in patients with BPD.

The predictive portion of this paper also seeks to address the literature that has suggested a relationship between childhood adversity and rates of physical (in)activity in adulthood, with associations ranging from weak [44] to strong [45, 46]. It has been well-established that patients with BPD have higher rates of childhood adversity, including experiences of emotional, verbal, physical, and sexual abuse, as well as neglect, compared to other patients with psychiatric disorders and the general public [47,48,49]. Thus, the predictive aim of this paper will include an exploration of whether childhood (and adult) adversity is a significant predictor of inactivity in adults with BPD when assessed with co-occurring symptomatic disorders, medical conditions, and demographic factors.

Methods

The current study is part of a multifaceted longitudinal study of the course of borderline personality disorder – the McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD). The methodology of this study, which was reviewed and approved by the McLean Hospital Institutional Review Board, has been described in detail elsewhere [50]. Briefly, all patients were initially inpatients at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts. Each patient was screened to determine that they were 18 to 35 years of age, had a known or estimated IQ of 71 or higher, and had no history or current symptomatology of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar I disorder, or an organic condition that could cause psychiatric symptoms.

After the study procedures were explained at index admission, written informed consent was obtained. Each patient then met with a master’s-level interviewer blind to the patient’s clinical diagnoses. Three semi-structured diagnostic interviews were administered: the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) [51], the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines (DIB-R) [52], and the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (DIPD-R) [53]. Good-to-excellent levels of interrater and test-retest reliability were achieved [54, 55].

The Revised Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ-R), a semi-structured interview, was also administered at index admission [49]. The CEQ-R assess three childhood adversity experiences: sexual abuse, other abuse (i.e., verbal, emotional, and/or physical abuse), and neglect (i.e., physical neglect, emotional withdrawal, inconsistent treatment, denial of patient’s feelings, lack of real relationship with parent or parental figure, caretaker placing patient in parental role, and caretaker’s failure to protect the patient). Each was scored for severity on a continuous scale, resulting in continuous scores for sexual abuse (0–12), other abuse (0–18), and neglect (0–42).

After index admission, patients were re-interviewed 12 times, with each follow-up interview separated by two years. At follow-up waves, diagnostic information was assessed via the same three diagnostic interviews used at study entrance. After informed consent was obtained, the MSAD diagnostic battery was re-administered. Good-to-excellent interrater reliability was maintained throughout the study for both symptomatic and personality disorder diagnoses [54, 55].

In addition to the core diagnostic battery, two additional semi-structured interviews were administered at each follow-up wave starting at two-year follow-up. The Revised Borderline Follow-up Interview (BFI-R) [56], which is the longitudinal analog to our baseline measure of demographics, psychosocial functioning, and treatment history (The Background Information Schedule [BIS]), assessed social and vocational functioning at all follow-up periods, including socioeconomic status (SES), education level and usage of social security insurance (i.e., SSDI). The Follow-Up Version of the Abuse History Interview (AHI) [57], similar to the BFI-R, is the longitudinal analog to our baseline measure of abuse (Abuse History Interview [AHI]). Both the AHI and its follow-up analog assessed adult experiences of violence, including verbal, emotional, physical, and sexual abuse at each follow-up period of the study. The AHI has been shown to have good psychometric properties [58].

Beginning at six-year follow-up through the end of the study, the Medical History and Services Utilization Interview (MHSUI) was administered to all patients. The MHSUI assesses physical health, lifestyle issues related to physical health (including questions about regular exercise), and health care utilization [41]. Medical diagnoses were not recorded unless they had been given to the subject by a physician.

In this study, physical inactivity was determined using the MHSUI interview, based on the question: “Do you exercise regularly? If so, how many minutes per week?” Participants were asked to provide an approximated time spent on physical activity during a typical week. A subject was considered inactive on the MHSUI if they reported less than 150 min per week of exercise. This definition mirrors general national guidelines for physical activity [59].

Though the MHSUI was first administered at the six-year follow-up, the latter part of the question probing for minutes of exercise per week was only added at the 12-year follow-up wave (i.e., early to mid-2000s), which coincided with the CDC updating their guidelines in 2008 to 150 min of exercise per week for an average adult [59]. As such, the term ‘baseline’ will refer to the 12-year follow-up, as that was the first wave that our definition of inactivity (using minutes/week) was measured.

Definition of recovery

Our measure of recovery had three elements. Recovery elements included: (1) a concurrent symptomatic remission from BPD (defined as no longer meeting DIB-R and DSM-III-R criteria for BPD for a period of at least two years), (2) having at least one emotionally sustaining relationship with a close friend or life partner or spouse, and (3) being able to work or go to school consistently, competently, and on a full-time basis.

Recovery status was assessed at each two-year follow-up via the BFI-R as well as the DIB-R and DSM-III-R criteria sets for BPD. Participants who recovered from BPD during the 12-year longitudinal study period were categorized as “ever-recovered” and those who did not were categorized as “never-recovered.”

Statistical analyses

Generalized estimating equations (GEE), with recovery status and time as main effects of interest, were used in longitudinal analyses of prevalence data. A test of recovery status by time interaction was also conducted. The inclusion of the recovery status by time interaction term allowed for a comparison of the patterns of change in inactivity over time between groups. However, this interaction term was not significant, and was thus removed from final analyses. The estimated coefficients of the GEE analyses, when exponentiated, yielded relative differences for recovery status and time. The p-level was set at p < 0.05 for the between-group comparison of inactivity.

GEE analyses were also used to examine predictors of inactivity in patients with BPD. Predictors represent static variables measured at index admission (CEQ-R) or study baseline (i.e., 12-year follow-up) (AHI, BFI-R, MHSUI, SCID). Predictors include childhood adversity experiences (severity of sexual abuse, severity of other abuse, severity of neglect), adult adversity experiences (physical partner violence, rape history), medical conditions (osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], and obesity), comorbid symptomatic disorders (major depression, any anxiety disorder, any substance use disorder, any eating disorder, or PTSD within the last two years), and demographic factors (sex, SES, college education, and SSDI utilization). Regarding the symptomatic disorders, any anxiety disorder included panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, simple phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), but excluded PTSD, as PTSD was classified as a trauma-spectrum disorder. Any substance disorder included alcohol and drug use disorder. Any eating disorder included anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), which included binge eating disorder.

All significant bivariate predictors with a p-level of < 0.05 were put into a multivariate model. To select the subset of predictors to be retained in the most parsimonious multivariate model, we compared a sequence of models in a backwards deletion manner. In both the bivariate and multivariate models, assessment period was always included as a covariate to allow for temporal variation in physical inactivity. The significance level of the multivariate model was set at p < 0.01.

Results

Participants

Two hundred and forty-five patients with BPD were interviewed at 12-year follow-up, when the version of the MHSUI containing the question regarding minutes of exercise per week was first administered. The demographic characteristics of these subjects are detailed in Table 1. Briefly, ever-recovered patients with BPD were significantly younger than never-recovered BPD subjects. There were no significant between-group differences for sex or race.

Table 1 Demographics characteristics of ever-recovered and never-recovered patients with borderline personality disorder
Full size table

Attrition was low throughout the study, with 206/249 (83%) of surviving patients with BPD (15 died by suicide and 26 died of other causes) remaining in the study through all 24 years of prospective follow-up.

Physical inactivity

Table 2 details the prevalence rates of physical inactivity among ever- and never-recovered BPD patients. Approximately 71% of never-recovered BPD patients reported being physically inactive at baseline (i.e., 12-year follow-up), as compared to 56% of ever-recovered patients. By 24-year follow-up, these prevalence rates held steady for the recovered group (approximately 56%), while decreasing to approximately 61% for the non-recovered group. Results from the regression analyses are displayed in the final three columns of Table 2. Age was added as a covariate in this model for recovery status due to the significant between-group difference (see Table 1 for details). Results can be interpreted in terms of relative differences between recovery status and relative change in inactivity levels over time. For instance, never-recovered patients who never recovered from BPD were 15% ([1-0.85]x100%) more likely to report being physically inactive than their recovered counterparts. In terms of relative change over time, inactivity rates for both groups taken together had an insignificant change over time, indicating that inactivity rates remained stable for both groups.

Table 2 Longitudinal prevalence rates of inactivity (%, N) among ever-recovered and never-recovered patients with BPD
Full size table

Predictor analyses

Table 3 displays the mean values and prevalence rates of the 17 predictor variables. These include three childhood abuse variables (CEQ-R), two adult abuse variables (AHI), three medical conditions (MHSUI), five symptomatic disorders (SCID), and four demographic factors (BFI-R).

Table 3 Descriptive characteristics of predictor variables
Full size table

Table 4 displays results of the bivariate predictor analyses. Two childhood adversity experiences (severity of sexual abuse, severity of neglect), one adult adversity experience (rape history), three medical conditions (osteoarthritis, COPD, obesity), one symptomatic disorder (PTSD), and three demographic factors (socioeconomic status, college education, and SSDI utilization) were significant bivariate predictors of inactivity. In the multivariate model using backwards deletion (Table 5), only one medical condition (obesity) and one symptomatic disorder (PTSD) remained significant, with obesity increasing one’s risk of being physical inactive by 13% and PTSD increasing the risk by 17% when studied together.

Table 4 Bivariate predictors of physical inactivity in patients with BPD
Full size table
Table 5 Multivariate predictors of physical inactivity in patients with BPD
Full size table

Discussion

Three important findings have emerged. First, never-recovered BPD patients were significantly more likely to report being physically inactive than ever-recovered patients. This finding is relatively unsurprising, as this may be part of the pattern of unhealthy lifestyle choices in the non-remitted or non-recovered group that we have detailed before, including smoking, alcohol use, daily sleep medication use, and use of pain medications [41, 42]. Conversely, these findings also suggest that achieving a symptomatic and psychosocial recovery from BPD may positively influence rates of physical activity (i.e., increased movement or activity due to gainful employment, enrollment in full-time classes, a more robust social life, etc.)

Our second finding is that, taken together, rates of inactivity for both ever- and never-recovered patients remained stable over time. This finding is both relatively surprising and unsurprising, given that one might expect inactivity to increase over time due to age-related conditions that could make physical activity more challenging (e.g., osteoarthritis). Alternatively, one might have even expected inactivity levels to decrease over the decade of follow-up in this study, given shifting cultural attitudes and/or behaviors related to physical activity, as epidemiological studies have shown that people are more active now than they were a decade ago [60,61,62,63]. Ultimately, however, both groups’ inactivity levels remained stable over time. Moreover, even though ever-recovered patients had significantly lower levels of inactivity compared to their never-recovered counterparts, it is important to note that still over half (56%) of ever-recovered patients reported being inactive by 24-year follow-up. These rates of inactivity are approximately twice that of the national American average, which was reported to be approximately 25% in 2022 [59]. This ultimately suggests that though recovery from BPD may be associated with lower levels of inactivity, physical inactivity still remains a problem for many of those with BPD.

Our third finding revealed two significant multivariate predictors of inactivity: obesity and PTSD. Both were positively associated with inactivity, with a diagnosis of obesity increasing the risk of inactivity by 13% and PTSD by 17% when studied together. This model suggests that an interaction between PTSD and obesity may be driving the higher levels of inactivity in patients with BPD. Prior research has shown that patients with PTSD report low levels of physical activity [32, 34, 64,65,66] and higher rates of obesity [65,66,67,68,69], which may go on to interact with BPD.

Despite some being significant bivariate predictors, none of the childhood or adult adversity variables were significant multivariate predictors. This suggests that inactivity in adult patients with BPD is driven far more by current medical and psychological problems rather than adversity experiences from either childhood or adulthood. However, it could be that the PTSD (which was a significant multivariate predictor) is directly related to these adversity experiences (such as severity of sexual abuse, severity of neglect, and history of rape, all of which were significant bivariate predictors of inactivity in patients with BPD).

Clinical implications

The psychological problems of patients with BPD may be overwhelming and distract the clinician from realizing the benefits, both medical and psychological, that can come from physical activity. The initiation of physical activity, even in middle-aged and older men, or in people who are medically compromised, has been associated with decreased mortality [70, 71]. Moreover, not only does this intervention decrease mortality, but it is associated with increased quality of life with minimal or few adverse effects [70]. Whether this would be true with respect to the symptoms of BPD has not yet been established but is worth exploring.

The causal relationship between physical inactivity and the persistence of borderline personality cannot be established in this study. But there is enough evidence to show that physical activity is helpful for alleviating depression and anxiety, common problems in people with BPD, that it should be encouraged.

Mental health clinicians are uniquely positioned to help their patients with BPD understand the benefits of physical activity, as they see them on a far more frequent basis than their primary care physicians. Clinicians can help their patients to understand and overcome perceived barriers to activity and explore their preferences and/or concerns related to physical activity. Physical activity should be included on the list of self-care behaviors that clinicians routinely encourage.

Limitations

The current study has several limitations. The first limitation is that patients were all inpatients at the time of index admission. It may be that levels of physical inactivity are different in outpatients or non-patients with BPD. An additional limitation is that the majority of patients in this study also participated in some type of intermittent treatment as usual in the community (including individual psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medication) during the course of the study [72, 73]. Thus, it is unknown whether inactivity levels may be related to the typically intermittent non-evidenced based treatment those with BPD were receiving in the community.

A third limitation of our study is related to our definition of physical activity. We were unable to differentiate between how many minutes patients spent engaging in moderate and vigorous activity in this study. Though the most promulgated CDC guideline highlights 150 min of moderate activity [59], the guidelines alternatively advise 75 min of vigorous activity, or some combination of the two. Although we collected information regarding the types of exercise patients engaged in, the vast majority endorsed two or more forms of activity in their daily lives, and we did not individually record the minutes spent on each type. Thus, we were not able to retrospectively ascertain more granular information regarding minutes at different intensity levels. Future studies would benefit from detailing the number of minutes spent in moderate and vigorous exercise, which would have given a more granular assessment of levels of activity.

Another possible limitation is that the data was obtained by self-report. However, research from federal surveys has shown that there is acceptable-to-good concordance with respect to physical health when self-report and medical records or physical measures are compared [74].

Future studies should include quantified descriptions of physical activity (which our lab is now pursuing), exploration of possible mechanisms mediating decrease in symptoms, and more precise measures of physical fitness. Psychosocial environmental factors, such as the availability of safe places to exercise, and cultural attitudes towards physical activity could also be explored.

Conclusions

In sum, we found that never-recovered patients with BPD reported higher levels of inactivity than their ever-recovered peers. These rates of inactivity remained stable across 12-years of follow-up. Both co-occurring symptomatic disorders (PTSD) and medical factors (obesity) appear to play a role in levels of inactivity in patients with BPD.

Data availability

Requests for data must be made to Dr. Mary C. Zanarini. Data is held in a secure cloud at Mass General Brigham, McLean’s parent company.

Abbreviations

AHI:

Abuse history interview

BPD:

Borderline personality disorder

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DIPD-R:

Diagnostic interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders

EDNOS:

Eating disorder not otherwise specified

GAD:

Generalized anxiety disorder

GEE:

Generalized estimating equations

MHSUI:

Medical history and services utilization interview

MSAD:

McLean study of adult development

OCD:

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

PTSD:

Post-traumatic stress disorder

BFI-R:

Revised borderline follow-up interview

CEQ-R:

Revised childhood experiences questionnaire

DIB-R:

Revised diagnostic interview for borderlines

SSDI:

Social security disability insurance

SES:

Socioeconomic status

SCID-I:

Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R Axis I disorders

References

  1. Vancampfort D, Firth J, Schuch FB, et al. Sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):308–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):1143–211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Guseh JS, Lieberman D, Baggish A. The evidence for experience in medicine—A new review series. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(3):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carnethon MR, Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Sidney S, Jacobs DR Jr, Liu K. Cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA. 2003;290(23):3092–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Rezende LFM, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VKR, Luiz ODC. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R, Blair SN, Després JP. Should we target increased physical activity or less sedentary behavior in the battle against cardiovascular disease risk development? Atherosclerosis. 2020;311:107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasfy MM, Lee I-M. Examining the dose-response relationship between physical activity and health outcomes. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(12):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox KR. The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public Health Nutr. 2(3a):411–8.

  9. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental-health: the Scottish health survey. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:1111–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mason P, Kearns A. Physical activity and mental wellbeing in deprived neighbourhoods. Ment Health Phys Act. 2013;6(2):111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005;18(2):189–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Perales F, del Pozo-Cruz J, del Pozo-Cruz B. Impact of physical activity on psychological distress: a prospective analysis of an Australian national sample. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(12):91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bartholomew JB, Morrison D, Ciccolo JT. Effects of acute exercise on mood and well-being in patients with major depressive disorder. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(12):2032–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawlor DB, Hopker SW. The effectiveness of exercise as an intervention in the management of depression: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;322(7289):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearce M, Garcia L, Abbas A, et al. Association between physical activity and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022;79(6):550–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J. Physical activity and likelihood of depression in adults: a review. Prev Med. 2008;46(5):397–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J. Physical activity, sedentary behavior and depression among disadvantaged women. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(4):632–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson E, Shivakumar G. Effects of exercise and physical activity on anxiety. Front Psychiatry. 2013;4(27):1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kandola A, Vancampfort D, Herring M, et al. Moving to beat anxiety: epidemiology and therapeutic issues with physical activity for anxiety. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(8):63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kandola A, Stubbs B. Exercise and anxiety. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1228:345–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuch FB, Stubbs B, Meyer J, et al. Physical activity protects from incident anxiety: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(9):846–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Asmundson GJ, Fetzner MG, Deboer LB, Powers MB, Otto MW, Smits JA. Let’s get physical: a contemporary review of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for anxiety and its disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30(4):362–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, O’Neal HA. Physical activity dose-response effects on outcomes of depression and anxiety. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S587–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanchez-Villegas A, Ara I, Guillén-Grima F, Bes-Rastrollo M, Varo-Cenarruzabeitia JJ, Martínez-González MA. Physical activity, sedentary index, and mental disorders in the SUN cohort study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(5):827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D. Physical activity, exercise, and mental disorders: it is time to move on. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2021;43(3):177–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bischoff S, Wieder G, Einsle F, et al. Running for extinction? Aerobic exercise as an augmentation of exposure therapy in panic disorder with agoraphobia. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;101:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Craft LL, Perna FM. The benefits of exercise for the clinically depressed. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6(3):104–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brellenthin AG, Lee DC. Physical activity and the development of substance use disorders: current knowledge and future directions. Prog Prev Med (NY). 2018;3(3):e0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klamert L, Bedi G, Craike M, Kidd S, Pascoe MC, Parker AG. Physical activity interventions for young people with increased risk of problematic substance use: a systematic review including different intervention formats. Ment Health Phys Act. 2023;25:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Piché F, Daneau C, Plourde C, Girard S, Romain AJ. Characteristics and impact of physical activity interventions during substance use disorder treatment excluding tobacco: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(4):e0283861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang D, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li R, Zhou C. Impact of physical exercise on substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110728.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall KS, Hoerster KD, Yancy WS. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder, physical activity and eating behaviors. Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:103–115.

  33. Oppizzi LM, Umberger R. The effect of physical activity on PTSD. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018;39:2179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Winning A, Gilsanz P, Koenen KC, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and 20-year physical activity trends among women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(6):753–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D, Steel Z, Newby J, Ward PB, Stubbs B. Physical activity in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Melissa R, Lama M, Laurence K, et al. Physical activity in eating disorders: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2019;12(183):1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brunet J, Del Duchetto F, Wurz A. Physical activity behaviors and attitudes among women with an eating disorder: a qualitative study. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(1):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Calogero RM, Pedrotty KN. The practice and process of healthy exercise: an investigation of the treatment of exercise abuse in women with eating disorders. Eat Disord. 2004;12(4):273–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerrigan SG, Lydecker JA, Grilo CM. Associations between physical activity and eating-disorder psychopathology among individuals categorised with binge-eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73(11):e13401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cook BJ, Wonderlich SA, Mitchell JE, Thompson R, Sherman R, McCallum K. Exercise in eating disorders treatment: systematic review and proposal of guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7):1408–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Frankenburg FR, Zanarini MC. The association between borderline personality disorder and chronic medical illnesses, poor health-related lifestyle choices, and costly forms of health care utilization. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(12):1660–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Keuroghlian AS, Frankenburg FR, Zanarini MC. The relationship of chronic medical illnesses, poor health-related lifestyle choices, and health care utilization to recovery status in borderline patients over a decade of prospective follow up. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(10):1499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. St-Amour S, Cailhol L, Ruocco AC, Bernard P. Acute effect of physical exercise on negative affect in borderline personality disorder: a pilot study. Clin Psychol Eur. 2022;4(2):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(4):245–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Monnat SM, Chandler RF. Long term physical health consequences of adverse childhood experiences. Sociol Q. 2015;56(4):723–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Temes CM, Magni LR, Fitzmaurice GM, Aguirre BA, Goodman M, Zanarini MC. Prevalence and severity of childhood adversity in adolescents with BPD, psychiatrically healthy adolescents, and adults with BPD. Personal Ment Health. 2017;11(3):171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yen S, Shea MT, Battle CL, et al. Traumatic exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in borderline, schizotypal, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: findings from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190(8):510–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zanarini MC, Williams AA, Lewis RE, et al. Pathological childhood experiences associated with the development of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(8):1101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J, Silk KR. The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(2):274–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB. The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: history, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):624–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG, Frankenburg FR, Chauncey DL. The revised diagnostic interview for borderlines: discriminating BPD from other axis II disorders. J Pers Disord. 1989;3(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Chauncey DL, Gunderson JG. The diagnostic interview for personality disorders: Interrater and test-retest reliability. Compr Psychiatry. 1987;28(6):467–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR. Attainment and maintenance of reliability of axis I and II disorders over the course of a longitudinal study. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(5):369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Vujanovic AA. (2002). Interrater and test-retest reliability of the revised diagnostic interview for borderlines (DIB-R). J Pers Disord. 2002;16(3),270 – 76.

  56. Zanarini MC, Sickel AE, Yong L, Glazer LJ. Revised Borderline Follow-up Interview; Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital;1994.

  57. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Marino MF, Reich DB, Haynes MC, Gunderson JG. Violence in the lives of adult borderline patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999;187(2):65–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Reich DB, Hennen J, Silk KR. Adult experiences of abuse reported by borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects over six years of prospective follow-up. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193:412–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Physical Activity. https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adults/index.htm.

  60. Hyde ET, Whitfield GP, Omura JD, Fulton JE, Carlson SA. Trends in meeting the physical activity guidelines: muscle-strengthening alone and combined with aerobic activity, United States, 1998–2018. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18:S37–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Omura JD, Hyde ET, Imperatore G, et al. Trends in meeting the aerobic physical activity guidelines among adults with and without select chronic health conditions, United States, 1998–2018. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18:S53–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Watson KB, Whitfield G, Chen TJ, Hyde ET, Omura JD. Trends in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity by race/ethnicity across income levels among US adults, 1998–2018. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18:S45–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Whitfield GP, Ussery EN, Saint-Maurice PF, Carlson SA. Trends in aerobic physical activity participation across multiple domains among US adults, national health and nutrition examination survey 2007/2008 to 2017/2018. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18:S64–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. De Assis MA, de Mello MF, Scorza FA, et al. Evaluation of physical activity habits in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinics. 2008;63(4):473–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. van den Berk-Clark C, Secrest S, Walls J, et al. Association between posttraumatic stress disorder and lack of exercise, poor diet, obesity, and co-occuring smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2018;37(5):407–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Zen AL, Whooley MA, Zhao S, Cohen BE. Post-traumatic stress disorder is associated with poor health behaviors: findings from the heart and soul study. Health Psychol. 2012;31(2):194–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Farr OM, Sloan DM, Keane TM, Mantzoros CS. Stress- and PTSD-associated obesity and metabolic dysfunction: a growing problem requiring further research and novel treatments. Metabolism. 2014;63(12):1463–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Jin H, Lanouette NM, Mudaliar S, et al. Association of posttraumatic stress disorder with increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29(3):210–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Masodkar K, Johnson J, Peterson MJ. A review of posttraumatic stress disorder and obesity: exploring the link. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016;18(1):10.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Lee IM, Jung DL, Kampert JB. The association of changes in physical-activity level and other lifestyle characteristics with mortality among men. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):538–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Posadzki P, Pieper D, Bajpai R, et al. Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Reich DB, Conkey LC, Fitzmaurice GM. Treatment rates for patients with borderline personality disorder and other personality disorders: a 16-year study. Psychiatric Serv. 2015;66:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Reich DB, Harned AL, Fitzmaurice GM. Rates of psychotropic medication use reported by borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects over 16 years of prospective follow-up. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;35:63–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. El-Gabalawy R, Katz LY, Sareen J. Comorbidity and associated severity of borderline personality disorder and physical health conditions in a nationally representative sample. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(7):641–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hollingshead AB. Two factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by two National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH grants) – MH47588 and MH62169 – granted to Dr. Mary C. Zanarini.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA

    Isabel V. Glass & Mary C. Zanarini

  2. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

    Frances R. Frankenburg

  3. Edith Nourse Rogers Veterans Administration Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA

    Frances R. Frankenburg

  4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Mary C. Zanarini

Authors
  1. Isabel V. Glass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frances R. Frankenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary C. Zanarini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IVG conducted relevant data analyses and interpreted these analyses under the direct supervision of MCZ. IVG wrote the first and subsequent drafts of the manuscript, with MCZ providing essential feedback on all versions of the paper. FRF reviewed and provided helpful suggestions on later drafts of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved this manuscript in its current form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary C. Zanarini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

APA ethical standards were followed in the conduct of this study. We received approval from the McLean Institutional Review Board to conduct this research. All research participants were properly consented prior to participating in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glass, I.V., Frankenburg, F.R. & Zanarini, M.C. Longitudinal description and prediction of physical inactivity among patients with borderline personality disorder and personality-disordered comparison subjects. bord personal disord emot dysregul 11, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00253-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00253-4

Keywords

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

ISSN: 2051-6673