Negative urgency partially accounts for the relationship between major depressive disorder and marijuana problems

Table 2 Bivariate Correlations

Variable	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.	9.	10.	11.	M (sd)
1. MJ problems	–	.37***	.14**	.21***	.05	.13*	.02	.21***	−.10	.01	−.10	1.07 (2.71)
2. MJ use		–	.12*	.17**	.04	.13*	.11*	.26***	−.18**	.07	−.01	16.13 (32.7)
3. PU			–	.56***	.19***	.15**	.42***	.19***	−.16**	−.14**	−.10	2.16 (.72)
4. NU				–	−.01	.21***	.43***	.29***	−.08	.01	.01	1.75 (.67)
5. SS					–	−.10	.07	−.07	−.21**	−.19**	−.00	2.88 (.69)
6. PS						–	.41***	.16**	−.08	.05	−.05	1.61 (.49)
7. PM							–	.23***	−.14**	−.00	.03	1.76 (.56)
8. MDD								–	−.02	−.16**	.04	--^a
9. Age									–	−.01	.08	--^a
10. Sex										–	−.02	--^a
11. Race											–	--^a

MJ Marijuana problems, MJ use % Marijuana use days, PU positive urgency, NU negative urgency, SS sensation seeking, PS lack of perseverance, PM lack of premeditation, MDD Major Depressive Disorder. ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05; ^a Mean and standard deviation not presented due to dichotomous variable, Table 1 presents appropriate descriptive statistics for these variables

ISSN: 2051-6673