Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Characterizing psychopharmacological prescribing practices in a large cohort of adolescents with borderline personality disorder

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation volume 11, Article number: 17 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Psychiatric medications are not efficacious for treating borderline personality disorder (BPD), yet many patients with BPD are prescribed multiple psychiatric medications. This study aimed to (1) characterize psychiatric medication prescribing practices in adolescents with BPD and (2) assess whether demographic features are associated with prescribing practices.

Method

This sample was N = 2950 pediatric patients with BPD (ages 10–19) across the U.S. Data came from the NeuroBlu database, which includes data from 30 U.S. healthcare systems and hundreds of hospitals. Poisson regressions and chi-squared tests determined whether gender, race, and ethnicity were associated with (1) number of unique psychiatric medications prescribed and (2) number of unique medication classes prescribed.

Results

Roughly two-thirds (64.85%) of youth were prescribed any medications. Of these youth, 79.40% were prescribed ≥ 2 unique medications and 72.66% were prescribed ≥ 2 unique medications classes. The mean number of unique medications was 3.50 (SD = 2.50). The mean number of unique medication classes was 2.35 (SD = 1.15). The most commonly prescribed medication classes were antidepressants and antipsychotics, which were often prescribed in combination. Poisson regressions showed that boys were prescribed more unique medications (M = 3.67) than girls (M = 3.47). Non-Latinx youth were prescribed significantly more unique medications (M = 44.12) than Latinx youth (M = 3.60, p = .01).

Conclusions

Results characterize psychiatric medication prescribing practices in youth with BPD. Prescribing practices vary by demographics, such that boys and non-Latinx youth are prescribed more medications than girls and Latinx youth, respectively. These demographic differences suggest that prescribers may treat BPD differently based on patient demographic characteristics.

Introduction

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by emotion dysregulation, impulsivity, unstable interpersonal relationships, unstable sense of self, feelings of worthlessness, and repeated self-injurious behavior. While many consider BPD to be a disorder found primarily in adulthood, BPD symptoms often manifest in adolescence [16, 20, 24, 42, 45]. If adolescent-onset symptoms persist for more than a year, BPD can be diagnosed [19].

Regardless of whether BPD onsets in adolescence vs. adulthood, there are no medications shown to be effective in treating BPD [47], and there are no psychiatric medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat BPD [36]. However, existing pharmacological treatment guidelines vary. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines state that pharmacotherapy should not be used to treat BPD symptoms, but that pharmacotherapy could be considered for treating comorbid psychiatric disorders among patients with BPD [21, 30]. The American Psychiatric Association guidelines state that BPD symptom-targeted pharmacotherapy could be used in conjunction with psychotherapy, which is the first-line treatment [7].

Despite pharmacotherapy for BPD being either not recommended at all or only in conjunction with psychotherapy, many people with BPD are prescribed psychiatric medications [5, 32]. The most commonly prescribed psychiatric medications are antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines [5, 21]. Although pharmacotherapy does not treat BPD’s underlying causes or mechanisms, pharmacotherapy may provide short-term symptom relief [32, 51] and may be prescribed to manage a crisis [7]. If pharmacotherapy is used, it is advised to prescribe only a single psychiatric medication at a time [4, 7].

In addition to the fact that pharmacological treatment in BPD is common despite no medications being effective for BPD specifically, many patients with BPD are often treated with multiple psychiatric medications [5, 32, 35]. This is referred to as polypharmacy [41, 45]. Polypharmacy can be quantified based on the number of medications or the number of medication classes. By either measure, polypharmacy is common in people with BPD. Studies find that 67–80% of patients with BPD are prescribed multiple medications [5, 32] and that two-thirds of patients (67%) are prescribed ≥ 2 medication classes [32]. Polypharmacy studies have been conducted among patients in psychiatric hospitals, outpatient psychiatric departments [5] and unspecified clinical sites [32]. Importantly, all studies, to our knowledge, have included adults only.

A clear gap in the BPD pharmacotherapy literature is that we are aware of only one study that has quantified the extent of pharmacotherapy overall, or polypharmacy specifically, in adolescents with BPD. A European Research Network Study on Borderline Personality Disorder found that 85% of youth had taken at least 1 psychotropic drug and that multiple prescriptions were more frequent than single prescriptions [6]. The limited knowledge on pharmacotherapy in youth with BPD may be due to the mismatch between DSM-5 and current clinical practice. Despite the DSM-5 allowing for BPD diagnoses prior to age 18 and the growing evidence and consensus for the validity and reliability of adolescent-onset BPD, some clinicians remain skeptical and reluctant to make a BPD diagnosis in adolescents [16, 24, 42].

Understanding the landscape of psychiatric prescribing practices for adolescents with BPD is important for multiple reasons. First, there is limited, if any, research on the long-term effects of psychopharmacological treatment in adolescents [39]. Second, valid concerns exist that psychiatric medications could have harmful effects on adolescents' rapidly developing brains [10]. Third, adolescents may be more vulnerable to adverse effects of psychotropic medications, and the risk–benefit ratio for medication in youth is often different than for adults [39].

The goal of the present study was to characterize psychiatric prescribing practices among adolescents with BPD. We had three aims. Aim 1 was to quantify the proportion of adolescents with BPD with versus without psychiatric medications prescribed between ages 10–19. Aim 2 was to characterize prescribing practices in adolescents with BPD, based on (1) the number of unique psychiatric medications prescribed between ages 10–19 and (2) the number of unique medication classes prescribed between ages 10–19. Aim 3 was to assess whether gender, race, or ethnicity were associated with prescriptions. We investigated the potential for demographic differences due to the underlying disparities in the healthcare system [27] and evidence that diagnosis of and treatment for psychiatric conditions varies based on race and ethnicity [9]. For instance, within a sample of 7.5 million patients, Native American/Alaskan Native patients had the highest rate of any psychiatric diagnosis (20.6%), while Asians received the lowest rates (7.5%). Further, amongst patients with a psychiatric diagnosis, non-Hispanic white patients were significantly more likely (77.8%) than other racial-ethnic groups to receive psychiatric medications [9].

Method

Participants

Data came from the NeuroBlu Database. NeuroBlu is a multisystem, multicenter server designed for behavioral health research. The version of data used in this analysis (22R5) includes data from 30 systems and hundreds of sites across the United States. All data were recorded as part of standard delivery of care. Data were obtained retroactively, and consent could not have been reasonably obtained [31]. NeuroBlu combined all sites’ de-identified data into a single cohesive, longitudinal data set. All data meet the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership data standards. IRB approval from Pennsylvania State University was obtained (STUDY00024964).

To obtain the sample used in analyses, we performed three steps. First, we selected all participants who had BPD diagnoses based on ICD-9 and/or ICD-10 codes. Then we determined the age of BPD diagnosis for each participant. This was calculated for each participant by taking the birth years and subtracting it from the year of first BPD diagnosis. Lastly, we selected only participants who were diagnosed with BPD between the ages of 10 and 19, inclusive, consistent with the World Health Organization’s definition of adolescence [50]. This resulted in a sample size of N = 2950. Moreover, our prescription data was limited to prescriptions that were prescribed between the ages of 10–19, to provide a clear picture of psychiatric medication prescribing practices for adolescents with BPD, during adolescence [50].

Measures

All variables were derived from electronic medical records and listed in the NeuroBlu database. Variables included in the current study were gender, race, ethnicity, year of birth, year of BPD diagnosis, and psychiatric prescriptions.

The prescription data are not linked to a specific diagnosis. Prescriptions were categorized into medication classes by NeuroBlu and in consultation with our psychiatrist co-author (AS). However, not all medication classes were considered for analysis. We only considered medication classes that may be used to treat BPD [44] and medication classes that have previously been included in BPD polypharmacy studies [5, 21, 25, 28, 43]. The medication classes considered were anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and lithium. Lithium was considered its own class due to its unique characteristics and not fitting into any of the other classes. Supplemental Table 1 lists the specific medications that were considered within each medication class.

We include four prescription-related outcomes. The first outcome is whether patients had any psychiatric medications prescribed between ages 10–19. The remaining outcomes apply only to those with medications. The second outcome is being prescribed ≥ 2 medications between ages 10–19. The third outcome is the number of unique medications prescribed between ages 10–19. For example, if an individual had prescriptions for fluoxetine and sertraline, they would be counted as having two prescriptions. The fourth outcome is the number of unique medication classes prescribed between ages 10–19. Using the example above, this individual would be counted as having one medication class, as both fluoxetine and sertraline fall within the same medication class (antidepressants).

For the third outcome (i.e., number of unique medications), we present data for three time periods. The first time period is the total number of unique medications between ages 10–19. The second time period is medications that were first prescribed before BPD diagnosis. The third time period is medications that were first prescribed after BPD diagnosis. This dataset does not have a way to link the medication to a specific diagnosis, so differentiating medications prescribed before vs. after BPD diagnosis allows for understanding of any potential prescribing differences that may have arisen once BPD diagnoses were made.

Similarly, for the fourth outcome (i.e., number of medication classes), we present data for four time periods: medication classes that were (1) prescribed between ages 10–19 overall, (2) first prescribed before BPD diagnosis, (3) first prescribed on the same day the BPD diagnosis was made, and (4) first prescribed after BPD diagnosis.

Data analytic plan

All analyses were performed in R [34]. Chi-square tests compared demographic characteristics based on (1) psychiatric medication status between ages 10–19 and (2) multiple medications vs. single medication. An independent samples t-test was used to compare age of first BPD diagnosis between those who were vs. were not prescribed medications. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number of unique medications, the number of unique medication classes, the maximum number of medication classes prescribed between age 10–19, and the most common medication class combinations prescribed between ages 10–19. Poisson regressions determined whether gender, race, and ethnicity were associated with the number of unique medications.

In supplemental analyses, we stratified demographic characteristics by when medications were prescribed (prior to BPD diagnosis vs. after BPD diagnosis). We completed Poisson analyses to determine associations between demographic characteristics and numbers of medications and medication classes for each time period. The results of these analyses were similar to the main analyses and are thus presented in Supplemental Tables 2–6.

We additionally calculated the timing of psychiatric medications relative to BPD diagnosis (Supplemental Table 7) and the number of people who did vs. did not have comorbid psychiatric disorders stratified by psychiatric medication status (Supplemental Tables 8–9).

Results

Table 1shows the sample demographic characteristics for the sample. Most participants were girls (81.46%, n = 2403) and White (49.36%, n = 1456). Ethnicity was not reported for half the sample (50.64%, n = 1494); most of those with ethnicity data were not Latinx (34.24%, n = 1010).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics for patients with borderline personality disorder with and without psychiatric medications between ages 10–19
Full size table

Table 1 shows demographic characteristics based on psychiatric medication status. Almost two-thirds of patients (64.81%, n = 1912) had at least one psychiatric medication between ages 10–19. Among all patients (i.e., regardless of medication status), over half (51.32%) were prescribed ≥ 2 medications between ages 10–19. However, among only patients with medications, 79.18% (n = 1514) were prescribed ≥ 2 psychiatric medications between ages 10–19.

More girls had any prescriptions compared to boys (χ2 = 10.05, p = 0.001). However, girls and boys had similar prevalence of being prescribed multiple medications (χ2 = 0.02, p = 0.90). For race, chi square tests were conducted only with White and Black participants, given the small sample sizes for all other races. The proportions of people who did vs. did not have prescriptions were similar for White and Black youth (χ2 = 0.11, p = 0.74). However, being prescribed multiple medications was descriptively higher in Black youth (83.68%) than in White youth (79.39%, χ2 = 0.32, p = 0.57). For ethnicity, the chi square included only individuals who were Latinx and not Latinx. Prescriptions were more common in non-Latinx youth vs. Latinx youth (χ2 = 6.67, p = 0.01). Similarly, being prescribed multiple medications was more common in non-Latinx youth vs. Latinx youth (84.74% vs 77.59%, χ2 = 6.67, p = 0.01). Age of first BPD diagnosis did not significantly differ between those with vs. without prescriptions (t = 0.11, p = 0.91).

Number of unique medications

Table 2 shows descriptive statistics for the number of unique medications and medication classes prescribed between ages 10–19.

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for the number of (1) unique psychiatric medications and (2) unique psychiatric medication classes per patient between ages 10–19, before diagnosis, and after diagnosis
Full size table

Among patients with prescriptions (N = 1912), the range of unique medications was 1–17, with a mean of 3.44 (SD = 2.43) and median of 3 unique medications. The range of unique medication classes was 1–5, with a mean of 2.29 (SD = 1.08) and median of 2 unique medication classes. Table 2 also shows the range, mean, standard deviation, and median of unique medications overall and unique medication classes prescribed prior to BPD diagnosis vs. after BPD diagnosis.

Table 3 shows the number of unique medications between ages 10–19, stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity.

Table 3 Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression results comparing number of unique psychiatric medications between ages 10–19 by demographic characteristics
Full size table

Poisson regressions assessed whether each demographic characteristic was associated with the number of unique medications. For gender, there were not significant differences (p = 0.29), though at a descriptive level, boys were prescribed more unique medications than girls. Across racial groups, the number of medications prescribed was not significantly different (ps = 0.06–0.87). Multiracial youth had the highest number of unique medications (M = 4.60, SD = 2.01), followed by Black or African American youth (M = 3.70, SD = 2.31), while Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander youth (M = 2.97, SD = 2.01) had the lowest number of unique medications. For ethnicity, non-Latinx adolescents were prescribed significantly more unique medications (M = 4.03, SD = 2.66) than Latinx adolescents (M = 3.51, SD = 2.61; p < 0.001).

Medication classes

Table 4 shows the number of people with prescriptions for five psychiatric medication classes overall, and the medication classes stratified by whether the first medication within the class was prescribed (1) before BPD diagnosis, (2) on the same day as BPD diagnosis, or (3) following BPD diagnosis.

Table 4 Frequency of each medication class being prescribed overall, and frequencies of when psychiatric medication classes were first prescribed (i.e., prior to BPD being diagnosed, on the same day as BPD diagnosis, or after BPD was diagnosed) between ages 10–19
Full size table

These groups are mutually exclusive. For instance, consider a participant who had two prescriptions within the antidepressant class: sertraline and fluoxetine. Sertraline was prescribed three years prior to BPD diagnosis, while fluoxetine was prescribed one year following BPD diagnosis. This participant would be counted only as having their first antidepressant medication prescribed prior to BPD diagnosis. Overall, these results show when medication classes are most commonly and initially prescribed relative to the timing of BPD diagnosis.

Antidepressants and antipsychotics were prescribed most commonly overall and within each unique time period (before BPD, same day as BPD, after BPD). When investigating prescription timing for each medication class, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics were most often prescribed before BPD diagnosis, compared to on the same day as diagnosis or following diagnosis. Only lithium was prescribed more often after BPD diagnosis, compared to before BPD diagnosis or on the same day as BPD diagnosis. No medications were most often prescribed on the same day as BPD diagnosis compared to other time periods.

Figure 1 shows the distribution of participants based on the maximum number of medication classes they were prescribed between age 10–19. Roughly one-third of participants were prescribed a maximum of two unique medication classes (32.53%). Roughly one quarter of participants were prescribed only one medication class (27.67%) and another quarter were prescribed a maximum of three medication classes (25.31%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of participants based on the maximum number of medication classes prescribed between age 10–19

Full size image

Figure 2 shows the most common medication classes and the most common combinations of medication classes prescribed between age 10–19, based on individuals’ maximum number of medication classes prescribed. For example, Fig. 2a shows that of participants who were prescribed a maximum of one medication class, almost two-thirds of prescriptions were within the antidepressant category (63.52%). Figure 2b shows that of participants who were prescribed a maximum of two medication classes, the most common medication combination was antidepressants + antipsychotics (45.50%). Figure 2c shows that of participants who were prescribed a maximum of three medication classes, the most common medication combinations were (1) antidepressants + antipsychotics + anxiolytics (38.43%) and (2) antidepressants + antipsychotics + anticonvulsants (38.22%). Finally, Fig. 2d shows that of participants who were prescribed a maximum of four medication classes, the most common medication combination was antidepressants + antipsychotics + anxiolytics + anticonvulsants (58.67%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a-d Distributions of participants based on the maximum number of prescribed medication classes (1–4) between age 10–19

Full size image

Discussion

This study characterized the psychiatric prescribing practices among adolescents with BPD during adolescence (ages 10–19) and examined whether being prescribed any or multiple psychiatric medications was associated with gender, race, and/or ethnicity. We found that roughly two-thirds of adolescents with BPD were prescribed psychiatric medications. Of those who were prescribed psychiatric medications, roughly 80% were treated with multiple psychiatric medications. These findings are similar to results from a study of service utilization among adolescents with BPD from the European Research Network on BPD, which found that 85% had been taken at least 1 psychotropic drug, and that multiple prescriptions were more common than single prescriptions [6]. This proportion of adolescents with BPD who are prescribed multiple psychiatric medications is comparable to the proportion of adults with BPD who are prescribed multiple psychiatric medications [5]. However, youth with BPD were prescribed an average of 3.50 medications during adolescence, which is higher than the average number of 2–3 medications reported in adults [21, 25]. The average number of unique medication classes prescribed to youth (2.35) is nearly identical to the average prescribed to adults (2.4; [25]).

These results demonstrate that pharmacotherapy overall and being prescribed multiple medications specifically are very common in adolescents with BPD, despite pharmacotherapy not having substantial empirical backing for BPD at any age, [5, 32, 35] let alone for adolescents. We also found that more girls with BPD were prescribed medications than boys with BPD. Latinx adolescents with BPD were prescribed fewer medications than non-Latinx adolescents with BPD.

Specific medication prescriptions relative to timing of BPD diagnosis

The most commonly prescribed psychiatric medication classes in youth with BPD were antidepressants and antipsychotics, and many of the most medication class combinations included both antidepressants and antipsychotics. This is similar to the most commonly prescribed medication classes in adults with BPD [5, 6]. Antidepressant, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and anxiolytic medications were most often prescribed prior to BPD diagnosis. Antidepressants being commonly prescribed prior to BPD diagnosis is not surprising, given that antidepressants are the most commonly prescribed medication class among youth with many different psychiatric diagnoses (with the exception of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and externalizing disorders; [23]). The finding that antipsychotics were commonly prescribed to adolescents diagnosed with BPD and that they were most commonly prescribed prior to BPD diagnosis, was surprising, given the significant risk profile of antipsychotics [39]. Antipsychotics confer risk of long-term serious side effects, including irreversible movement disorders, weight gain, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and elevated prolactin levels [39]. Similarly, anticonvulsant medications have a broad range of impairing side effects, including irritability, aggression, hyperactivity, headache, gastrointestinal distress, drowsiness, dizziness, and blurred vision, as well as potentially serious side effects such as hepatic failure, pancreatitis, hyponatremia, and hematologic abnormalities [15, 26]. These potential adverse effects are particularly important to consider for adolescents, given that adolescents are going through periods of rapid hormonal and neurological development [39].

Lithium prescriptions were most common after BPD diagnosis. There are a handful of possible explanations for this finding. First, lithium may have been most often prescribed following BPD diagnosis because medications with fewer possible side effects and not requiring blood monitoring were initially prescribed but did not result in adequate treatment response and therefore more intensive medications were prescribed. Second, people with BPD often experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and are at high risk for death by suicide [29]. Providers may be more focused on a patient’s risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors upon a patient receiving a BPD diagnosis and may consider starting lithium because it is one of the few medications that reduces long-term suicide risk [14]. However, we believe it is important to reiterate two points. First, our data do not provide a way to link prescriptions to diagnoses, so we cannot draw a conclusion as to whether medications were prescribed for BPD symptoms specifically or for a comorbid condition. Second, although there are understandable reasons providers may use pharmacotherapy as a treatment for BPD symptoms, there are no medications shown to be effective in treating BPD pathology [47].

Demographic differences

We found some evidence for prescribing differences based on gender, ethnicity, and race. First, medications overall were more common in girls versus boys with BPD, but multiple medications were similar in girls and boys with BPD. This was somewhat surprising, given that polypharmacy in general is more prevalent in men versus women, and this gender difference has become widespread in child and adolescent psychiatry [17]. However, it is worth noting that women are much more likely than men to be represented in BPD treatment-seeking samples [38], despite population-based surveys generally finding that BPD prevalence is similar across genders [38]. Thus, pharmacotherapy data for boys or men with BPD is more limited [12] and this pattern of findings requires replication.

Second, we found evidence for ethnic differences in the extent of pharmacotherapy, where Latinx adolescents were prescribed fewer medications compared to non-Latinx adolescents. However, Black adolescents with BPD were prescribed descriptively more medications compared to White adolescents, though this result was not statistically significant. Research describing racial and ethnic differences in pharmacotherapy for BPD is limited. However, some racial and ethnic differences have been noted for other mental health conditions, which together may suggest disparate mental health treatment among racial and ethnic minority groups [8]. For example, one study noted that Black and Latinx patients were less likely to be prescribed an antidepressant when compared to White patients [8]. Another study investigated racial and ethnic differences in (1) antidepressant medications among youth with depression and (2) antipsychotic medications among youth with neurodevelopmental disorders. For both diagnostic groups, racial and ethnic minority youth were less likely than White youth to receive pharmacotherapy [23].

Even though racial and ethnic minorities’ lower extents of psychiatric medications in the context of BPD could be seen as a more favorable outcome, given that polypharmacy for BPD is generally not recommended, these lower rates could also be an indicator of racial bias and racism within the US healthcare system [22]. Indeed, when laypeople and mental health providers are presented with the exact same vignettes of people experiencing psychopathology, they rate that psychopathology is less distressing to Black people versus White people [18]. Moreover, when clinicians believe a patient’s distress is lower, they are more likely to provide less intensive treatment [18]. Although we are not aware of data assessing whether these Black-White differences extend to Latinx people, this is an important direction for future study.

Another possible explanation for racial and ethnic minority adolescents’ lower extents of any psychiatric medications could be due to differences in cultural beliefs about healthcare [3]. For example, Hispanic patients are more likely to attribute mental health concerns to family conflict, lack of a support system, and religious circumstances than to a medical condition requiring medical care [40]. If patients attribute their symptoms to an external cause that a medication would not impact, they may be less likely to accept a medication as treatment.

However, there are several important caveats to the demographic differences reported here. First, it is possible that there are demographic differences in BPD diagnosis—i.e., some groups may be more likely to receive a BPD diagnosis, while other groups may be less likely to receive a BPD diagnosis [13, 49]. Our dataset does not capture those with false negative or false positive diagnoses. Second, it is also possible that there are demographic differences in the people with BPD who do vs. do not seek or receive treatment for BPD. For instance, girls and women with eating disorders are more likely to seek eating disorder treatment than boys and men with eating disorders [11, 48]. Given that our dataset only includes people being treated for BPD, we cannot assess how demographic characteristics may or may not relate to treatment status.

Clinical implications

These findings may inform prescribing practices for youth with BPD in several ways. First, results increase awareness of the near ubiquity of psychopharmacological treatment among youth with BPD. Specifically, nearly two-thirds of adolescents with BPD are being treated with psychiatric medications between ages 10–19 and more than 80% of medicated youth are being treated with multiple psychiatric medications, despite no medications being effective for treating BPD overall [47] and little research, to our knowledge, that has investigated medication efficacy in youth with BPD. Second, the demographic differences highlight the possibility of disparate treatment being provided for the same diagnosis based on the individual’s gender, race or ethnicity. This highlights the need to address health disparities for the treatment of BPD across racial and ethnic groups of adolescents with BPD.

Strengths, limitations, and future directions

Strengths of this study include a large sample size and a sample of adolescents with BPD, who are a vulnerable but previously unstudied population for characterizing psychopharmacological prescribing practices. Given the substantial growth and development during adolescence, studying prescribing practices overall and by drug class for adolescents with BPD fills an important gap in the literature.

Limitations are as follows. First, these data do not allow us to link prescriptions to a specific diagnosis, so we are not able to discern whether medications were prescribed to treat BPD symptoms versus comorbid psychiatric disorders. It makes intuitive sense that the more comorbid diagnoses someone has, the more medications they may be prescribed. Although these data do not allow us to definitively assess this intuition, Supplemental Table 9 shows that the number of medications prescribed do not systematically differ based on the presence or absence of comorbidities. Further, given that comorbidity is nearly ubiquitous among people with BPD [13], it is possible that some medications were prescribed for treating symptoms other than those of BPD. However, we did limit our included medications to those most commonly used to treat BPD symptoms specifically. This approach has pros and cons. On the one hand, we included medications based on the existing literature (which exclusively included adult samples), and it therefore reflects a narrow estimate of psychiatric prescribing practicing during adolescence for youth with BPD. On the other hand, we excluded stimulants, which is a frequently prescribed psychiatric medication class for youth with externalizing and neurodevelopmental disorders, such as oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [1, 33]. There is accumulating evidence suggesting that externalizing problems and neurodevelopmental disorders should also be considered in the etiology and treatment of BPD in adolescents [2, 46]. Therefore, stimulants may need to be considered in future studies assessing psychiatric prescribing practices in adolescents with BPD. Second, these data do not provide a way to determine whether medications were prescribed concurrently, and, as such, we do not refer to our findings as indicators of polypharmacy per se, given that polypharmacy typically implies multiple medications prescribed simultaneously. Third, the dataset does not contain data on features that may be associated with prescribing practices, such as states or regions, visit types, or prescriber credentials. Fourth, these data could not determine whether patients were receiving other forms of psychological treatment, such as psychotherapy. Some parents or patients may not have had access to psychotherapy, and psychiatric medication may have been more accessible. Fourth, the data do not allow assessing the efficacy or impact of psychiatric medications on symptom severity, though we again highlight the widespread consensus that psychiatric medications are not recommended or evidence-based treatment for BPD [5, 32].

Given these limitations, a pressing future direction to explore relates to a common and difficult ethical dilemma: is some treatment better than no treatment? If we assume that psychiatric medications are not effective for youth with BPD (as is the case for adults with BPD; [36, 47]), but youth with BPD cannot access more evidence-based treatments like psychotherapy [6], what impact do psychiatric medications have on youth’s longer-term functioning and healthcare costs associated with BPD? In other words, if gold-standard treatments are not available or accessible [6], and yet adolescents are experiencing distressing, impairing, and potentially life-threatening BPD symptoms, are psychiatric medications more helpful or more harmful, and does the risk–benefit profile differ for short-term vs. long-term use? We believe this issue requires more research, including perspectives from multiple stakeholders, including patients, their families, and prescribers.

Another important future direction of research is assessing differences in prescribing patterns for people with BPD based on gender, race, and ethnicity, and specifically research on bias and discrimination that people from marginalized groups experience in healthcare settings [22]. Relatedly, assessing prescribing practices and differences based on sexual orientation is also important, considering that (1) sexual minority individuals are far more likely to be diagnosed with BPD compared to heterosexual individuals but (2) several BPD criteria could be viewed as normative responses to living in a structurally stigmatizing environment [37].

Conclusion

In summary, we found that approximately two-thirds of adolescents with BPD had at least one psychiatric medication. Of youth with BPD who had any psychiatric medications, 79.40% were prescribed ≥ 2 medications, with an average of 3.50 different medications and 2.35 medication classes. Findings also showed demographic differences that may suggest differential treatment practices for racial and ethnic minority youth with BPD. Future research is needed that investigates the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for youth with BPD when first-line treatments (i.e., psychotherapy) are not available. Overall, characterizing prescribing practices in youth with BPD extends the field’s understanding of the scope of psychiatric prescribing practices in young people with BPD.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Arnsten AFT. Stimulants: therapeutic actions in ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(11):2376–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Babinski DE, McQuade JD, Waschbusch DA. A latent profile analysis of borderline personality features and externalizing problems in youth. J Clin Psychol. 2021;77(3):732–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey RK, Blackmon HL, Stevens FL. Major depressive disorder in the African American population: meeting the challenges of stigma, misdiagnosis, and treatment disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:1084–9.

  4. Biskin RS, Paris J. Management of borderline personality disorder. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):1897–902. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.112055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bridler R, Häberle A, Müller ST, et al. Psychopharmacological treatment of 2195 in-patients with borderline personality disorder: a comparison with other psychiatric disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25(6):763–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cailhol L, Jeannot M, Rodgers R, et al. Borderline personality disorder and mental healthcare service use among adolescents. J Personal Disord. 2013;27(2):252–9. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.2.252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanen AM, Thompson KN. Prescribing and borderline personality disorder. Aust Prescr. 2016;39(2):49–53. https://doi.org/10.18773/austprescr.2016.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cerdeña I, Holloway T, Cerdeña JP, Wing A, Wasser T, Fortunati F, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in psychiatry resident prescribing: A quality improvement education intervention to address health equity. Academic Psychiatry. 2021;45(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-021-01397-z.

  9. Coleman KJ, Stewart C, Waitzfelder BE, et al. Racial-ethnic differences in psychiatric diagnoses and treatment across 11 health care systems in the mental health research network. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(7):749–57. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyle JT. Psychotropic drug use in very young children. JAMA. 2000;283(8):1059–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.8.1059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forrest LN, Smith AR, Swanson SA. Characteristics of seeking treatment among U.S. adolescents with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(7):826–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman M, Patil U, Steffel L, Avedon J, Sasso S, Triebwasser J, et al. Treatment utilization by gender in patients with borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Pract. 2010;16(3):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000375711.47337.27.

  13. Grant BF, Chou SP, Goldstein RB, Huang B, Stinson FS, Saha TD, Smith SM, Dawson DA, Pulay AJ, Pickering RP, Ruan WJ. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: results from the wave 2 national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(4):533–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant B, Salpekar JA. Using lithium in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: efficacy, tolerability, and practical considerations. Paediatr Drugs. 2018;20(4):303–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-018-0289-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harbord MG. Significant anticonvulsant side-effects in children and adolescents. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas. 2000;7(3):213–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.1999.0190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaess M, Brunner R, Chanen A. Borderline personality disorder in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):782–93. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kukreja S, Kalra G, Shah N, et al. Polypharmacy in psychiatry: a review. Mens Sana Monogr. 2013;11(1):82–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.104497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kunstman JW, Ogungbadero T, Deska JC, et al. Race-based biases in psychological distress and treatment judgments. PLoS One. 2023;18(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293078.

  19. Larrivée M-P. Borderline personality disorder in adolescents: the He-who-must-not-be-named of psychiatry. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013;15(2):171–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Leichsenring F, Leibing E, Kruse J, et al. Borderline personality disorder. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;377(9759):74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61422-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magni LR, Ferrari C, Barlati S, et al. Psychopharmacological treatment in borderline personality disorder: a pilot observational study in a real-world setting. Psychiatry Res. 2021;295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mateo CM, Williams DR. Addressing bias and reducing discrimination: the professional responsibility of health care providers. Acad Med. 2020;95(12S):S5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merikangas KR, He J, Rapoport J, et al. Medication use in US youth with mental disorders. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(2):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller AL, Muehlenkamp JJ, Jacobson CM. Fact or fiction: diagnosing borderline personality disorder in adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(6):969–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moeller KE, Din A, Wolfe M, et al. Psychotropic medication use in hospitalized patients with borderline personality disorder. Ment Health Clin. 2016;6(2):68–74. https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2016.03.68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mutanana N, Tsvere M, Chiweshe MK. General side effects and challenges associated with anti-epilepsy medication: a review of related literature. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Community-Based Solutions to Promote Health Equity in the United States; Baciu A, Negussie Y, Geller A, et al., editors. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); The State of Health Disparities in the United States. 2017. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425844/.

  28. Ning AY, Theodoros T, Harris K, et al. Overdose and off-label psychotropic prescribing in patients with borderline personality disorder: a retrospective series. Australas Psychiatry. 2023;31(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562231153009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Paris J. Suicidality in borderline personality disorder. Medicina (Mex). 2019;55(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060223.

  30. Pascual JC, Arias L, Soler J. Pharmacological Management of Borderline Personality Disorder and Common Comorbidities. CNS Drugs. 2023;37:489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01015-6.

  31. Patel R, Wee SN, Ramaswamy R, Thadani S, Tandi J, Garg R, Calvanese N, Valko M, Rush AJ, Rentería ME, Sarkar J, Kollins SH. NeuroBlu, an electronic health record (EHR) trusted research environment (TRE) to support mental healthcare analytics with real-world data. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057227.

  32. Paton C, Crawford MJ, Bhatti SF, et al. The use of psychotropic medication in patients with emotionally unstable personality disorder under the care of UK mental health services. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(4):16358. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14m09228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pringsheim T, Hirsch L, Gardner D, et al. The pharmacological management of oppositional behaviour, conduct problems, and aggression in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 1: psychostimulants, alpha-2 agonists, and atomoxetine. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(2):42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371506000202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. 2022. https://www.R-project.org.

  35. Riffer F, Farkas M, Streibl L, et al. Psychopharmacological treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: comparing data from routine clinical care with recommended guidelines. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2019;23(3):178–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2019.1576904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ripoll LH. Psychopharmacologic treatment of borderline personality disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013;15(2):213–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodriguez-Seijas C, Morgan TA, Zimmerman M. A population-based examination of criterion-level disparities in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder among sexual minority adults. Assessment. 2021;28(4):1097–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121991922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Gender patterns in borderline personality disorder. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2011;8(5):16–20. 

  39. Schneider C, Taylor D, Zalsman G, et al. Antipsychotics use in children and adolescents: an on-going challenge in clinical practice. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf). 2014;28(7):615–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114533599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shao Z, Richie WD, Bailey RK. Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Major Depressive Disorder. J Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2016;3:692–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-015-0188-6.

  41. Shapiro-Thompson R, Fineberg SK. The state of overmedication in borderline personality disorder: interpersonal and structural factors. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2022;9(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-021-00255-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharp C, Fonagy P. Practitioner review: borderline personality disorder in adolescence – recent conceptualization, intervention, and implications for clinical practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(12):1266–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Soler J, Casellas-Pujol E, Fernández-Felipe I, et al. “Skills for pills”: the dialectical-behavioural therapy skills training reduces polypharmacy in borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022;145(4):332–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Soloff PH. Psychopharmacology of borderline personality disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000;23(1):169–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70150-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Starcevic V, Janca A. Pharmacotherapy of borderline personality disorder: replacing confusion with prudent pragmatism. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stepp SD, Whalen DJ, Pedersen SL. The externalizing pathway to borderline personality disorder in youth. In: Handbook of borderline personality disorder in children and adolescents. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2014. p. 247–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_17.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Stoffers-Winterling JM, Storebø OJ, Pereira Ribeiro J, et al. Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;11(11):CD012956. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Swanson SA, Field AE. Commentary: Considerations for the use of registry data to study adolescent eating disorders. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(2):488–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tomko RL, Trull TJ, Wood PK, Sher KJ. Characteristics of borderline personality disorder in a community sample: comorbidity, treatment utilization, and general functioning. J Pers Disord. 2014;28(5):734–50. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2012_26_093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. World Health Organization. Adolescent health. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health . Last accessed 17 Nov 202 .

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Gunderson JG. Pharmacotherapy of borderline outpatients. Compr Psychiatry. 1988;29(4):372–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(88)90018-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant KL2 TR002015 and Grant UL1 TR002014 (LNF). The grant funder played no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

    Sarah Hauryski, Alison Swigart, Dara Babinski, Daniel A. Waschbusch & Lauren N. Forrest

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA

    Alexandra Potts

Authors
  1. Sarah Hauryski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Potts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alison Swigart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dara Babinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel A. Waschbusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lauren N. Forrest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SH: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing - original draft. AP: writing - original draft. AS: conceptualization, writing - review and editing. DB and DAW: writing - review and editing. LF: conceptualization, writing - review and editing, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren N. Forrest.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

N/A, as all data are de-identified electronic medical record data.

Consent for publication

N/A, as all data are de-identified electronic medical record data.

Competing interests

DB has previously received consulting fees from Supernus Pharmaceuticals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauryski, S., Potts, A., Swigart, A. et al. Characterizing psychopharmacological prescribing practices in a large cohort of adolescents with borderline personality disorder. bord personal disord emot dysregul 11, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00262-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-024-00262-3

Keywords

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

ISSN: 2051-6673