Skip to main content

Table 3 Sociodemographic Variables relationship with Psychological Distress and Positive Mental Well-being

From: The relationship between social support, coping strategies and psychological distress and positive mental well-being in carers of people with borderline personality disorder

  

Psychological Distress

Positive Mental well-being

 

Test

Statistic

p

Effect size6

Statistic

p

Effect size6

Carer variables

       

Age1,4

r

− 0.21

< 0.001

 

0.14

< 0.001

 

Gender2

F(3, 859)

1.60

0.19

< 0.01

1.19

0.31

< 0.01

Education2

F(2, 860)

5.03

< 0.01

0.01

4.45

0.01

0.01

Employment3

t(861)

2.22

0.03

0.16

-1.21

0.23

0.09

Intervention3

t(861)

6.34

< 0.001

0.49

-4.46

< 0.001

0.35

Chronic Illness3

t(861)

-6.23

< 0.001

0.50

6.55

< 0.001

0.50

Person with BPD variables

       

Age1

r

− 0.02

0.50

 

0.07

0.05

 

Gender2

F(3, 859)

1.61

0.19

< 0.01

1.41

0.24

< 0.01

Employment3

t(861)

-1.36

0.17

0.10

1.98

0.05

0.15

Estimated no. of days of self-harm4

r

0.15

< 0.001

 

− 0.15

< 0.001

 

Estimated no. of days of suicide attempts4

r

0.15

< 0.001

 

− 0.09

0.01

 

Relationship variables

       

Relation to person with BPD2

F(4,858)

3.12

0.02

0.01

2.52

0.04

0.01

Living with person with BPD3

t(861)

-4.15

< 0.001

0.28

5.95

< 0.001

0.41

Hours of contact4

r

0.17

< 0.001

 

− 0.23

< 0.001

 

Years of caregiving4

r

− 0.07

0.05

 

0.06

0.08

 
  1. Note: 1 Pearson correlation; 2 One-way ANOVA 3. T-test. 4 Spearman correlation; 5 Mann-Whitney test; 6 Effect sizes reflect Hedge’s g for t-tests (small (0.2), medium (0.5) and large (0.8)) and η2 for one-way ANOVAs (small (0.02), medium (0.13) and large (0.26))