Skip to main content

Table 1 Table 1

From: Dose-dependent changes in real-life affective well-being in healthy community-based individuals with mild to moderate childhood trauma exposure

 

Behavioral Sample (N = 351)

Associations with trauma load

(CTS sum score)

M ± SD / count

min/max

n

Spearman’s ρ /

F value a

p value

Demographic data a

     

Age (year)

24.80 ± 6.54

18.11/56.02

351

0.237

< 0.001

Sex (male/female)

162/189

N/A

351

0.068

0.201

Education (years)

13.27 ± 1.89

8/16

350

-0.119

0.026

Socioeconomic status (SES)

14.53 ± 3.16

6.20/21.00

350

-0.179

0.001

Personality

     

NEO-FFI Openess (mean)

14.94 ± 4.89

1/24

347

0.017

0.751

NEO-FFI Agreeableness (mean)

17.67 ± 3.92

5/24

346

-0.113

0.038

NEO-FFI Conscientiousness (mean)

18.04 ± 3.63

6/24

346

-0.115

0.033

NEO-FFI Extraversion (mean)

15.08 ± 3.61

1/24

347

-0.217

< 0.001

NEO-FFI Neurotizismus (mean)

7.80 ± 4.63

1/24

348

0.175

0.001

Risk Factors

     

Early adversity (CTS, sum)

6.29 ± 1.97

5/18

351

---

---

Trait anxiety (STAI-T, sum)

35.20 ± 8.57

20/71

349

0.321

< 0.001

Loneliness (UCLA, mean)

32.51 ± 10.51

20/87

346

0.396

< 0.001

Daily Stress (ABF)

2.21 ± 0.68

1.00/4.66

319

0.174

0.003

BCOPE-maladaptive coping (sum)

21.37 ± 4.22

12/36

343

0.164

0.002

Protective Factors

     

Mental wellbeing (WHO-5, sum)

16.27 ± 4.09

2/25

346

-0.166

0.002

Satisfaction with life (SWLS)

27.06 ± 5.06

5/35

349

-0.310

< 0.001

Optimism (LOT-R optimism, sum)

16.52 ± 3.74

3/24

346

-0.279

< 0.001

Sense of coherence (SOC, sum)

148.71 ± 19.68

72/197

345

-0.342

< 0.001

Self-efficacy (SWE, sum)

30.38 ± 4.27

17/40

349

-0.147

0.007

Perceived social support (BSSS, sum)

29.83 ± 3.61

8/32

350

-0.312

< 0.001

BCOPE-adaptive coping (sum)

37.90 ± 6.37

14/54

343

-0.120

0.021

EMA b

     

Valence (MDBF)c

75.08 ± 11.21

27.16/99.14

347

7.43

0.007

Energetic arousal (MDBF)c

58.80 ± 11.14

27.96/87.45

347

4.65

0.032

Calmness (MDBF)c

69.55 ± 11.55

19.73/98.59

347

4.09

0.044

Alone (alone/not alone)d

33/84

NA

347

0.83

0.363

Don’t like the companyc

10.54 ± 9.74

0.24/69.12

347

1.40

0.237

Rather be alonec

14.96 ± 13.58

0.17/66.17

347

2.48

0.117

Positive event appraisalc

23.64 ± 13.84

1.5/75.71

347

1.86

0.174

Negative event appraisalc

11.29 ± 7.97

0.67/55.00

347

0.00

0.982

Affective (in)stability (valence MSSD)

275.05 ± 211.71

1.07/1448.43

347

0.44

0.508

E-diary prompts per day

12.51 ± 1.79

7/20

347

-0.084

0.118

E-diary Compliance (%)e

81.59 ± 14.26

32.93/100

347

-0.088

0.105

  1. CTE dose-dependent changes in real-life well-being and psychosocial metrics, well-known as risk and protective factors for mental well-being. For details on the psychosocial questionnaires including acronyms, see Supplemental Table S2. Abbreviations: M = mean, SD = standard deviation, n = number of participants with available data, MSSD valence = mean square of successive differences of valence ratings.
  2. aSpearman’s correlation, partial spearman’s correlation controlling for sex, age, SES, education; F-values from multilevel analysis (controlling for time of the day and time of the day-squared, level 1, and for sex, age, SES, education, and daily hassles, level 2, see Methods section and sMethods for details).
  3. bAggregation of EMA indices within and between subjects for use for sample description only;
  4. cmean/day/participant,
  5. dnumber of prompts participants reported being alone out of all prompts across 7 days of measurement, mean;
  6. ePercent of answered prompts.
Back to article page

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

ISSN: 2051-6673