Skip to main content

Table 2 Sample description with parameters of network inference for N2

From: On the interplay of borderline personality features, childhood trauma severity, attachment types, and social support

Measure

Mean

SD

range

Labelling in NA

St-C

Br-St

R2

Sex

26.32% male

Sex

.3

.28

.74

Age

26.89

9.44

18—65

Age

.36

.28

.14

PAI-BOR total

27.74

8.96

6—56

    

 affective instability

8.31

2.67

2 -16

PAI_AI

.63

.00

.42

 identity disturbance

7.34

3.33

1- 15

PAI_ID

1.01

.44

.61

 negative relationships

8.25

2.86

2—16

PAI_NR

.68

.23

.46

 self-harm

3.84

2.28

1—13

PAI_SH

.54

.16

.32

CTQ total

50.25

13.87

30—107

    

 emotional abuse

11.91

5.87

5—25

CTQ_EA

1.33

.90

.66

 physical abuse

8.73

4.19

5—25

CTQ_PA

.81

.00

.38

 sexual abuse

6.67

3.94

4—20

CTQ_SA

.55

.08

.26

 emotional neglect

14.76

3.71

6 -25

CTQ_EN

.46

.21

.32

 physical neglect

8.17

1.97

4—18

CTQ_PN

.17

.00

.05

AAS

 attachment closeness

19.48

5.82

6 – 30

AAS_C

.52

.08

.45

 attachment dependence

16.70

5.46

6 – 30

AAS_D

1.41

.66

.68

 attachment anxiety

19.23

6.75

6 – 30

AAS_A

.89

.57

.64

MSPSS total

62.75

16.07

12 – 84

    

 social support family

19.36

7.50

4 – 28

SS_FA

.96

.71

.54

 social support friends

21.22

6.23

4 – 28

SS_FR

.62

.26

.39

 social support significant other

28.00

6.53

4 – 28

SS_SO

.62

.20

.28

  1. n = 1102; NA Network Analysis, St-C Strength Centrality, Br-St Bridge Strength, R2 Predictability