Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of effect sizes of all included studies

From: Third-wave interventions for eating disorders in adolescence – systematic review with meta-analysis

Studies included in the meta-analysis N Cohen’s d Effect size
Accurso et al. (2019) [44] EDE Interview (global score) 11 −0.12 small
Fischer et al. (2015) [46] EDE Interview (global score) 7 −0.63 moderate
Johnston et al. (2015) [47] EDE-Q (global score) 33 −0.68 moderate
Mazzeo et al. (2016) [38] EDE-Q (global score) 12 −0.50 moderate
Murray et al. (2015) [48] EDE-Q (global score) 35 −1.53 large
Peterson et al. (2019) [49] EDE-Q (global score) 12 −0.26 small
Timko et al. (2015) [53] EDE Interview (global score) 32 −0.62 moderate
Studies not included in the meta-analysis N Cohen’s d Effect size
Baudinet et al. (2020) [45] EDI-3 (subscales) 105 −0.07 to − 0.39 small
Salbach et al. (2007) [54] EDI-2 31 −0.02 to − 0.63 small – moderate
Salbach-Andrae et al. (2008) [51] EDI-2 (subscales) 12 −0.42 to −3.03 small – large
Salbach-Andrae et al. (2009) [52] prä-post EDI-2 (subscales) 16 −0.36 to −1.56 small –large
  SIAB (subscales) 16 −0.08 to −2.29 small – large
  DBT vs. WCG EDI-2 (subscales) a 31 0.70 to 1.47 large
  SIAB (subscales) a 31 1.44 to 1.85 moderate – large
Schneider et al. (2010) [50] EDI-2 (subscales)bc 41 0.38 to 0.40 small
  SIAB (subscales)c 41 0.21 to 2.14 small – large
  1. a calculated from η2 in original publication b Authors only provided data for selected EDI subscales, c effect sizes from original publication due to unreported m and SD