Author (year) | Country | Study design,BPD assessments | Population | Sample characteristics | Sociodemographic data | Outcome assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barnow et al. (2013) [19] | Germany | Longitudinal,2 assessments | Community, Greifswaldfamily study | N = 381; range 11–18;55.1% female | NR | Structured Clinical Interview forDSM-III-R (SCID-II)1 and SCIDII-forDSM-IV1,2 |
Bornovalova et al. (2018) [20] | U.S. | Longitudinalcohort study,3 assessments | Community, Minnesotatwin family study | N = 1.080; range 14–24;100% female | 95.3% white | Minnesota Borderline PersonalityDisorder Scale (MBPD)1 |
Dixon-Gordon et al. (2016) [21] | U.S. | Longitudinal,4 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 113; range 16–18;100% female | Low-income neighborhoods; 65%African American, 35% White; 55%of familes receive public assisstance | Structured Clinical Interview forDSM-IV Personality Disorders(SIDP-IV)2 |
Ehrenreich, Beron &Underwood (2016) [22] | U.S. | Longitudinal,2 assessments | Community | N = 287; range 14–19;52% female | 23.1% African American, 1.6% Asian,61.6% Caucasian, 18.3% Hispanic,5.4.% other | The Mclean Screening Instrumentfor BPD (MSI)1 |
Greenfield et al. (2015) [23] | Canada | Longitudinal,2 assessments | (In)Outpatient | N = 286; range 12–18;72% female | 69.5% Caucasian, 7.5.% AfricanAmerican, 2.2.% Hispanic, 3.1%Aboriginal, 5.3.% Asian, 12.4% other | Abbreviated Diagnostic Interviewfor Borderlines (Ab-DIB)1 |
Hallquist, Hipwell & Stepp(2015) [24] | U.S. | Longitudinal,4 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 2.228; range 14–17;100% female | Low-income neighborhoods | International Personality DisorderExamination-Screen (IPDE-S)1 |
Haltigan & Vaillancourt(2016) [25] | Canada | Longitudinal,4 assessments | Community, McMasterteen study | N = 566; range 13–16;55.5% female | NR | Borderline Personality Features Scalefor Children (BPFS-C)1 |
Lazarus et al. (2019) [26] | U.S. | Longitudinal,5 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 2.310; range 15–19,100% female | Low-income neighborhoods; 59.8%Black, 40.2% White; 33.2% of familiesreceive public ssisstance | International Personality DisorderExamination (IPDE-BOR)1 |
Sharp et al. (2020) [27] | U.S. | Longitudinal,5 assessments | Community | N = 1.042; range 13–18;56% female | 31.4% Hispanic, 29.4% White, 27.9%African Americans, 3.6% Asian, 7.7%other; 19.4% reveived mental healthtreatment | Borderline Personality Features Scalefor Children (BPFS-C)1 |
Stepp, Keenan, Hipwell &Krueger (2014) [28] | U.S. | Longitudinal,6 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 2.282; range 14–19;100% female | Low-income neighborhoods; 53%African American, 41.2% EuropeanAmerican, 5.8% other; | International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1 |
Stepp et al. (2014) [6] | U.S. | Longitudinal,4 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 2.212; range 14–17;100% female | 38.9% of families receive publicassisstance | International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1 |
Stepp & Lazarus (2017) [29] | U.S. | Longitudinal,9 assessments | Community, Pittsburghgirls study | N = 2.344; range 14–22;100% female | Low-income neighborhoods; 53%African American, 41.2% Caucasian,5.8% other | International Personality DisordersExamination (IPDEBOR)1 |
Strandholm et al. (2017) [30] | Finland | Longitudinal,2 assessments | Outpatient, Adolescentdepression study | N = 218; range 13–19;81.5% female | Low-income neighborhoods; 58.7%minority race; 38.9% of familiesreceive public assisstance | Structured Clinical Interview andScreen (Personality Questionnaire)for DSM-IV PDs1,2 |
Vanwoerden, Leavitt, Gallagher& Temple (2019) [31] | U.S. | Longitudinal,5 assessments | Community | N = 818; range 16–21;58% female | 32% Hispanic, 31.3% White, 27.1%African American, 1.8% Asian, 7.7.%other | Borderline Personality FeaturesScale for Children (BPFS-C)1 |