Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the ANOVA of the dependent variables “emotion intensity” and “confidence rating” in stimuli with neutral/emotion and anger/happiness blends

From: A negative bias in decoding positive social cues characterizes emotion processing in patients with symptom-remitted Borderline Personality Disorder

 

Emotion Intensity

Confidence

F

p

ηp2

F

p

ηp2

Anger/Happiness blends

 Groupa

<.1

.975

<.001

1.9

.168

.020

 Ratinga

2.5

.120

.025

8.5

.005

.081

 Group x ratinga

2.0

.163

.020

.4

.516

.004

 Blendb

1.3

.280

.013

9.2

<.001

.088

 Group x blendb

1.0

.361

.010

.3

.712

.003

 Rating x blendb

619.3

< .001

.866

19.6

<.001

.169

 Group x rating x blendb

5.3

.008

.052

.1

.863

.001

Neutral/Emotion blends

 Groupa

0.7

.417

.007

2.9

.090

.030

 Ratinga

6.2

.014

.061

63.4

<.001

.398

 Group x ratinga

0.4

.510

.005

1.4

.235

.015

 Blenda

17.3

<.001

.153

6.2

.015

.061

 Group x blenda

0.4

.554

.004

0.4

.534

.004

 Intensitya

36.0

<.001

.273

18.1

<.001

.159

 Group x intensitya

< 0.1

.930

<.001

< 0.1

.839

<.001

 Rating x blenda

1709

<.001

.947

119.8

<.001

.555

 Group x rating x blenda

3.7

.058

.037

0.8

.387

.008

 Rating x intensity

9.0

.003

.086

1.2

.273

.012

 Group x rating x intensitya

2.5

.120

.025

< 0.1

.870

<.001

 Blend x intensitya

< 0.1

.908

<.001

10.8

.001

.101

 Group x blend x intensitya

0.6

.424

.007

0.1

.747

.001

 Rating x blend x intensitya

208.1

<.001

.684

1.7

.202

.017

 Group x rating x blend x intensitya

0.7

.418

.007

0.6

.434

.006

  1. a: df1 = 1, df2 = 96; b: Unadjusted degrees of freedom: df1 = 2, df2 = 192; p-value adjusted according to the correction of Greenhouse & Geisser