Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of Multinominal Regression comparing Adverse Childhood Experiences and Parental as well as Peer Relationship Quality between no BPD (0–2 criteria; N = 22), subthreshold BPD (3–4 criteria, N = 48 with full BPD (≥5 criteria; N = 82)

From: Differentiating BPD in adolescents with NSSI disorder: the role of adverse childhood experiences and current social relationships

 

95% Cl for Odds Ratio

B

SE B

Lower

Odds Ratio

Upper

p

No versus Full BPD

 Sex

−2.95

0.91

.01

.05

.31

.001

 Age

−.69

0.23

.32

.50

.79

.003

 Adverse Childhood Experiences

−1.88

0.70

.04

.15

.59

.007

 Parent Relationship Quality

−.57

0.38

.27

.56

1.19

.134

 Peer Relationship Quality

.66

0.36

.95

1.93

3.92

.067

 ACE X Parent Relationship Quality

−.31

0.51

.27

.73

2.00

.544

 ACE X Peer Relationship Quality

.29

0.63

.39

1.33

4.57

.647

Subthresshold versus Full BPD

 Sex

−1.72

0.80

.04

.18

.86

.032

 Age

−0.35

0.16

.52

.71

.96

.027

 Adverse Childhood Experiences

−1.42

0.50

.09

.24

.64

.004

 Parent Relationship Quality

−.44

0.28

.37

.65

1.12

.122

 Peer Relationship Quality

−.45

0.24

.40

.64

1.02

.059

 ACE X Parent Relationship Quality

−.74

0.34

.25

.48

.93

.029

 ACE X Peer Relationship Quality

.26

0.39

.61

1.30

2.78

.501

  1. Note: R2 = .20 (Cox & Snell), .23 (Nagelkerke). Model χ2 (14) = 33.27, p = .003. Bold values are significant p < .05