Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Logistic Regression Analysis for (the cumulative effect of) Adverse Childhood Experiences and Parent as well as Peer Relationship Quality Predicting Categorical Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD > 4 criteria) and Hierarchical Regression Coefficients of the Relationship Between the predicting variables, and Dimensional Borderline Personality Disorder (N = 152)

From: Differentiating BPD in adolescents with NSSI disorder: the role of adverse childhood experiences and current social relationships

 

Categorical BPD

Dimensional BPD

Collinearity Stat.

B

SE B

EXP (B)

p

95% CI B

B

SE B

EXP (B)

p

95% CI B

Tolerance

VIF

Step 1

Age

.41

.13

1.50

.002

1.16, 1.94

.47

.11

.31

.000

0.25, 0.70

0.998

1.002

Gender

−1.87

.69

.15

.006

0.04, 0.59

−1.66

.52

−.24

.002

−2.69, −0.64

0.998

1.002

Step 2

Age

.41

.14

1.50

.003

1.15, 1.96

.45

.11

.30

.000

0.23, 0.67

0.993

1.007

Gender

−1.84

.71

.16

.009

0.04, 0.64

−1.50

.50

−.22

.003

−2.50, −0.51

0.989

1.011

Adverse Childhood Experiences

.89

.31

2.42

.004

1.33, 4.41

.85

.24

.26

.001

0.37, 1.33

0.988

1.012

Step 3

Age

.39

.14

1.48

.005

1.12, 1.95

.47

.11

.31

.000

0.24, 0.69

0.955

1.047

Gender

−1.93

.73

.15

.008

0.04, 0.60

−1.55

.50

−.23

.003

−2.54, −0.55

0.985

1.015

Adverse Childhood Experiences

1.37

.44

3.95

.002

1.67, 9.33

1.03

.33

.31

.002

0.38, 1.69

0.531

1.882

Parent Relationship Quality

.37

.24

1.45

.124

0.90, 2.34

.21

.20

.11

.293

−0.18, 0.59

0.539

1.856

Peer Relationship Quality

.13

.21

1.14

.540

0.76, 1.70

−.16

.17

−.07

.354

−0.49, 0.17

0.923

1.084

Step 4a

Age

.39

.14

1.48

.005

1.16, 2.07

.48

.11

.32

.000

0.26, 0.71

0.942

1.062

Gender

−1.93

.73

.15

.008

0.03, 0.52

−1.61

.51

−.24

.002

−2.61, −0.61

0.977

1.024

Adverse Childhood Experiences

1.37

.44

3.95

.002

1.86, 10–75

1.10

.33

.33

.001

0.44, 1.76

0.521

1.920

Parent Relationship Quality

.37

.25

1.45

.130

0.97, 2.63

.25

.20

.13

.208

−0.14, 0.64

0.526

1.900

Peer Relationship Quality

.13

.21

1.13

.541

0.78, 1.79

−.14

.17

−.06

.410

−0.46, 0.19

0.918

1.090

ACE X Parent Relationship Quality

.59

.30

1.81

.048

1.01, 3.25

.34

.24

.11

.157

−0.13, 0.82

0.945

1.058

Step 4b

ACE X Peer Relationship Quality

−.01

.35

.99

.971

0.50, 1.96

−.13

.27

−.04

.639

−0.66, 0.51

0.971

1.030

  1. Note: bold values are significant p < .05. Nagelkerkes R2 = .15 for Step 1; Nagelkerkes R2 = .22 for Step 2; Nagelkerkes R2 = .24 for Step 3; Nagelkerkes R2 = .24 for Step 4; R2 = .150 for Step 1; R2 = .214 for Step 2; R2 = .224 for Step 3; R2 = .235 for Step 4