Skip to main content

Table 2 Results from multilevel analyses in which Negative Affect (NA) is predicted by a random intercept, by Appraisals and NA at the previous time point at level 1, which are again modeled in function of a Healthy Controls (HC) dummy and a Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) dummy at level 2

From: Emotional reactivity to appraisals in patients with a borderline personality disorder: a daily life study

      

Difference groups

Fixed Effect

Coeff.

SE

t-ratio

df

p-value

χ2 (df)

p-value

For intercept, β0

 BPDdummy, γ01

36.58

3.99

9.16

56

< 0.001

48.79 (1)

<.001

 HCdummy, γ02

7.31

1.27

5.75

56

< 0.001

  

For goal relevance at t-1 slope, β1

 BPDdummy, γ11

0.04

0.03

1.47

56

0.148

1.21 (1)

0.270

 HCdummy, γ12

0.01

0.01

0.96

56

0.343

  

For goal congruence at t-1 slope, β2

 BPDdummy, γ21

−0.07

0.03

−2.16

56

0.035

0.91 (1)

>.500

 HCdummy, γ22

−0.03

0.02

−1.80

56

0.077

  

For emotion-focused coping potential at t-1 slope, β3

 BPDdummy, γ31

−0.07

0.03

−2.42

56

0.019

1.73 (1)

0.186

 HCdummy, γ32

−0.02

0.03

−0.67

56

0.509

  

For NA at t-1 slope, β4

 BPDdummy, γ41

0.34

0.05

7.41

56

< 0.001

0.72 (1)

>.500

 HCdummy, γ42

0.28

0.05

5.70

56

< 0.001

  

For intercept, β0

 BPDdummy, γ01

36.60

3.99

9.16

56

< 0.001

48.82 (1)

<.001

 HCdummy, γ02

7.31

1.27

5.75

56

< 0.001

  

For disappointed self t-1 slope, β1

 BPDdummy, γ11

0.05

0.03

1.59

56

0.118

0.02 (1)

>.500

 HCdummy, γ12

0.04

0.02

2.30

56

0.025

  

For disappointed someone else t-1 slope, β2

 BPDdummy, γ21

0.04

0.01

2.71

56

0.009

7.58 (1)

.006

 HCdummy, γ22

−0.01

0.01

−0.91

56

0.366

  

For trust self t-1slope, β3

 BPDdummy, γ31

0.04

0.03

1.76

56

0.085

2.09 (1)

0.144

 HCdummy, γ32

0.00

0.01

0.26

56

0.796

  

For trust someone else t-1 slope, β4

 BPDdummy, γ41

−0.04

0.03

−1.16

56

0.250

0.60 (1)

>.500

 HCdummy, γ42

−0.01

0.02

−0.52

56

0.609

  

For NA at t-1 slope, β5

 BPDdummy, γ51

0.36

0.04

8.43

56

< 0.001

0.91 (1)

>.500

 HCdummy, γ52

0.30

0.05

5.99

56

< 0.001

  
  1. Coeff. Coefficient, SE Standard error. All predictors were entered person-mean centered. Different models were estimated for the general emotional appraisals and BPD-specific evaluations. Differences between diagnostic dummies slopes are tested using general linear hypothesis testing