Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of outcome measures (BIS-11, CPT-II, Time Paradigm, SKIP and TCIP) between participants assigned to mindfulness training (n = 19) and participants assigned to interpersonal effectiveness training (n = 25)

From: Effects of mindfulness training on different components of impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: results from a pilot randomized study

 

Mindfulness

Interpersonal effectiveness

    
 

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Time

Group

Group × Time

Cohen’s d [95 % CI]

 

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

p

p

p

 

BIS-11

            

 Motor

18.10

3.52

15.78*

4.76

19.20

4.14

17.28

5.66

.004

.30

.77

−0.09 [−0.68, 0.51]

 Attentional

19.68

2.90

18.26*

3.03

18.76

3.56

18.36

3.23

.07

.63

.30

0.32 [−0.29, 0.91]

 Non-planning

23.73

6.34

21.05**

5.83

24.32

7.12

23.48

5.56

.006

.41

.13

−0.46 [−1.06, 0.15]

CPT-II

            

 Response Style

.72

1.20

.97

1.07

.22

.40

.30

.77

.21

.02

.50

0.22 [−0.38, 0.81]

 Commissions

11.25

9.25

9.68

7.77

14.88

8.01

13.30

7.19

.09

.12

.97

0.00 [−0.60, 0.60]

 Hit RT

418.30

64.60

449.03

80.08

395.27

84.27

402.95

68.31

.50

.10

.39

0.37 [−0.24, 0.97]

 Impulsivity Index

26.87

5.61

24.52*

5.68

29.23

6.98

28.00

6.35

.01

.11

.23

−0.26 [−0.85, 0.34]

Time Paradigm

56.64

24.75

68.13*

32.12

51.86

12.45

53.27

12.34

.007

.11

.034

0.66 [0.04, 1.27]

SKIP

1.19

.61

1.01

.65

.96

.67

.99

.57

.35

.44

.18

0.40 [−0.21, 1.00]

TCIP

1.32

.52

1.01*

.58

1.11

.55

1.24

-56

.21

.96

.003

0.95 [0.31, 1.57]

  1. Note. M Mean, SD Standard Deviation, BIS – 11 Barrat Impulsiveness Scale, CPT – II Continuous Performance Test, Hit RT Hit Reaction Time, SKIP Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm, TCIP Two Choice Impulsivity Paradigm. Group by time interactions refers to univariate effects, T- test *p < .05, **p < .01. Effect sizes refer to pre- and post-treatment differences