Skip to main content

Table 2 Mixed model ANOVA results for OMS-HC subscales: time and survey type

From: Stigma towards borderline personality disorder: effectiveness and generalizability of an anti-stigma program for healthcare providers using a pre-post randomized design

  Time Survey type Time* survey interaction
  Mean (SE) Assessment of significance Mean (SE) Assessment of significance Mean difference (SE) Assessment of significance
Attitudes towards mental illness T1 = 10.53 (.20) T2 = 9.51 (.19) F (1,189) = 39.83 ƞ2 partial = .174 p < .001 Original = 8.91 (.25) BPD = 11.14 (.25) F (1,189) = 40.32 ƞ2 partial = .176 p < .001 T1 Orig. vs. BPD =2.98 (.40) T2 Orig. vs. BPD =1.48 (.37) F (1,189) = 21.96 ƞ2 partial = .104 p < .001
Disclosure/help-seeking T1 = 10.84 (.19) T2 = 10.15 (.19) F (1,188) = 19.47 ƞ2 partial = .094 p < .001 Original = 9.77 (.24) BPD = 11.22 (.25) F (1,189) = 17.84 ƞ2 partial = .087 p < .001 T1 Orig. vs. BPD =1.94 (.38) T2 Orig. vs. BPD =0.97 (.38) F (1,188) = 9.83 ƞ2 partial = .050 p = .002
Preference for social distance T1 = 11.26 (.17) T2 = 10.38 (.15) F (1,189) = 34.32 ƞ2 partial = .154 p < .001 Original = 9.35 (.20) BPD = 12.29 (.20) F (1,189) = 112.53 ƞ2 partial = .373 p < .001 T1 Orig. vs. BPD =3.26 (.33) T2 Orig. vs. BPD =2.63 (.30) F (1,189) = 4.44 ƞ2 partial = .023 p = .036
Back to article page

Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation

ISSN: 2051-6673